3 ms·
But the pros you give for video are orthogonal to the actual video-ness of them. Your pro-video points seem to be largely "More up to date and more content is
by andybak 6y ago
But the pros you give for video are orthogonal to the actual video-ness of them.
Your pro-video points seem to be largely "More up to date and more content is available"
So - maybe authoring/hosting/promoting/monetizing video is easier than with web pages? These are issues that could potentially be fixed and they have nothing to do with the intrinsic nature of video - linear, constant time usually with a spoken audio track. These are the qualities that I find problemmatic. I actually don't mind slides - they are linear but they aren't constant time and they work independently of the voiceover (most times there's a talk I'm interested in I'll find the slides and skip the actual talk - even if I miss some content it's worth it to be able to skim through quickly and not be tortured by someone's vocal quirks).
There's a few maths YouTubers I can bear - mainly because they speak extremely quickly and there's no fluff. I'd still prefer to be reading the same material however.