Sure, here are some samples from the source. This is Eglot's code. Try and figure out what's happening in each of these passages: https://github.com/joaotavor

Sure, here are some samples from the source. This is Eglot's code. Try and figure out what's happening in each of these passages: https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/blob/master/eglot.el#L417 https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/blob/master/eglot.el#L41... https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/blob/master/eglot.el#L417 https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/blob/master/eglot.el#L41... https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/blob/master/eglot.el#L1737 https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/blob/master/eglot.el#L17... Contrast with lsp-mode: https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-mode.el#L1125 https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-mode.e... https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-mode.el#L1125 https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-mode.e... https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-modeline.el#L115 https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/blob/master/lsp-modeli... The lsp-mode code is a lot easier to follow, in my opinion. It's a lot clearer what's happening (although I can't say much about whether either are overabstracted which is admittedly a big concern. I haven't looked into that). I remember watching an argument between the original authors on Reddit a while back. The lsp-mode author came across as... let's just say more professional. lsp-mode seems much closer to a professional product to me in general.