3 ms·

I largely agree with you, except on the market. The market is good at finding local minimums/maximums, but even there it fails when there’s weird trends and pe

I largely agree with you, except on the market. The market is good at finding local minimums/maximums, but even there it fails when there’s weird trends and perceived benefits. Like the SUV trend that stubbornly won’t go away. Bad drivers behind these 5000 lbs death-on-wheels is the primary reason I would never own a sub compact, even as a second car! This is where government comes in, to gently but firmly guide the market through taxes and rules.

Sohcahtoa82 6y ago
> Bad drivers behind these 5000 lbs death-on-wheels is the primary reason I would never own a sub compact, even as a second car! I really wish crash test scores would factor in the effect of the car they hit. People have this idea that "bigger = safer", and all it's done is create an arms race. My previous car was a Subaru BRZ, a 2-door coupe not much bigger than a Miata. In crash tests, it scored great! If I hit a wall, pole, tree, or another Subaru BRZ, it was a very safe car. But if I got hit by a 5,500 Chevy Suburban, my small car would be obliterated. Of course, the "bigger = safer" mentality also ignores the fact that a smaller, lighter car is going to be more agile and will do a much better job at avoiding crashes altogether. It'd be interesting to see if purchasing patterns changed if testing driving a car included having to take it through a course where you had to practice emergency maneuvers.