3 ms·
So now he’s violating the songwriter’s copyright instead of the artist’s.
by ChristianGeek 6y ago
So now he’s violating the songwriter’s copyright instead of the artist’s.
- retsibsi 6y agoPossibly; I don't know the law. I didn't mean that as any kind of legal defence, just a note that the discussion around direct transcription/reproduction doesn't have so much direct relevance here.