2 ms·
> But musl doesn't implement Unicode wchar_t either. It looks like it does. iswalpha uses some kind of table to return its response. Is that implementation som
by mwcampbell 6y ago
> But musl doesn't implement Unicode wchar_t either.
It looks like it does. iswalpha uses some kind of table to return its response. Is that implementation somehow too simplistic?
- bonzini 6y agoYou're right I looked up only iswalnum and iswdigit, and trusted masklinn on the rest. :-) So I remembered right, musl assumes an encoding of Unicode where 128-255 is invalid.