3 ms·
The merge complexity in darcs 2 really hasn't been an issue in my usage. As I understand it, it is resolved for darcs 3, but maybe I misunderstood that from sk
by gnufx 6y ago
The merge complexity in darcs 2 really hasn't been an issue in my usage. As I understand it, it is resolved for darcs 3, but maybe I misunderstood that from skimming what was going on. (The new theory seems to be different to Pijul's, and perhaps inferior.) I'd be happy with either as a joy to use.
- stevekemp 6y agoI/we definitely hit it in real life, sufficiently often that it became obvious we needed to move to another solution. At the time it was probably CVS to darcs, then it became darcs -> hg, and giving in to the inevitable it became git.