> would it not be fair to say that humans have exploded in number, along with livestock, Only that part is fair to say. But that it: > makes that a somewhat m

> would it not be fair to say that humans have exploded in number, along with livestock, Only that part is fair to say. But that it: > makes that a somewhat misleading statistic Isn't "fair" at all. There the "misleading" claim, I guess, presumes that the cost of human and livestock population exploding is nothing to the rest of nature, whereas it's completely the opposite: that's one visible point, and the cause of all imbalances that follow. The problem is, of course, that the change of the environment by humans has the consequences will impact the humans more than they are able to cope.