3 ms·
"If Wikileaks was as altruistic about shedding light on the evils of the world, why haven’t they published anything about China, or about Russia?" Just so I un
by rendall 6y ago
"If Wikileaks was as altruistic about shedding light on the evils of the world, why haven’t they published anything about China, or about Russia?"
Just so I understand, it's your contention that Wikileaks chooses to release nothing about Russia or China?
If, hypothetically speaking, this were demonstrated to be untrue - meaning, that Wikileaks were demonstrated to be at least as critical of, and damaging to, the interests of China and Russia - would you be prepared to change your mind about Wikileaks?
- georgeplusplus 6y agoThe practice I abhor is releasing a SWATH of documents, not intended for public consumption which are more akin to ideas in infancy and leaving it out there for people to form opinions on with no context. Having other nations documents released would be a start to why America acted a certain way Or said certain things. this practice of bulk releasing is tarnishing to diplomacy around the world, what’s even worse is when Wikileaks only targets the western world and its allies.
- shi314 6y agoUS is not equal to western. Also, Rest of the World don't do dirty things and hide behind a saint front. All Bad shit China is doing is out in open and is having tribunals in International Courts. Even Nobel Peace Prize is given to a Chinese Whistle Blower, I haven't heard China awarding any Western Whistle Blower.
- rendall 6y ago...what’s even worse is when Wikileaks only targets the western world and its allies You've made this assertion twice now, and again I ask: if your assertion were demonstrated to be untrue, would you change your mind about Wikileaks?