4 ms·

They’re not dual identifiers; one is an argument label and the other is the parameter name. Maybe it’s because I come from an ObjC background, but this is one o

They’re not dual identifiers; one is an argument label and the other is the parameter name. Maybe it’s because I come from an ObjC background, but this is one of my favorite aspects of the syntax; IMO it makes code way easier to read without having to look up method definitions to figure out what each argument does.

dmitriid 6y ago
From State of the Platform this year: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ebb51t6XkAIF4YD?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ebb51t6XkAIF4YD?format=jpg&name=... Which for is for and would work as for for?
- cutler 6y ago
  Madness.
  - factotvm 6y ago
    As a disclaimer, I’ve written Swift, but this seems to be a simple concept. The first name is the interface and is used at the call site, and the second (optional) name is used within the scope of the function, should the developer want a more descriptive name.