That's what makes the article noteworthy. There are a thousand articles of various quality out there telling you some variation on "dynamic languages are useful

That's what makes the article noteworthy. There are a thousand articles of various quality out there telling you some variation on "dynamic languages are useful for prototyping and scripting, Rust/C/Java really shines in large codebases / when performance or reliability or security is important". It didn't convince me, though. There were a lot of "this tool or library or feature exists in Rust", but no comparative advantage over other languages more compelling than this: > This certainly is in part because I’m more proficient in Rust than in Python. It’s also because the Rust mental model is closer to how my brain works than the Python one.