4 ms·
You're assuming that because you can create raw pointers in safe code, they were not introduced because or belong to Unsafe Rust, which is an incorrect assumpti
by rcvalle 6y ago
You're assuming that because you can create raw pointers in safe code, they were not introduced because or belong to Unsafe Rust, which is an incorrect assumption.
If you still think that both my contribution and the official documentation are incorrect, you're welcome to start a discussion on my contribution's PR, and open an issue on the official documentation repository.
As I said before, I'm all open to suggestions on how it can be better worded to not cause any misunderstandings, but these have to be constructive suggestions that would actually improve it.
- svrb 6y agoCan you explain why you believe "remove the misleading sentence" is not constructive?