That's now unfortunately too late, I can no longer edit or delete the comment, maybe one of the mods can censor it. And by the way, you added a new photo to the

That's now unfortunately too late, I can no longer edit or delete the comment, maybe one of the mods can censor it. And by the way, you added a new photo to the article but the original file is still there, following the link in my comment still yields the photo with the visible part number. There might very well be people out there that notice that the article has 1.png, 2.png, 3.png, 44.png, an image with something hidden, and then 5.jpg [1] and then start to wonder what 4.png or 4.jpg might look like. [1] Yes, there are also 5.png, 6.png, and 8.png in between out of order, it is not a perfect pattern, but it is still close enough that one might notice the missing 4.png.