>Nowhere in the article did it say that the directory of the NIH call the anecdotal reports "credible". Sounds like nitpicking to me. Dr. Fauci directly says i

>Nowhere in the article did it say that the directory of the NIH call the anecdotal reports "credible". Sounds like nitpicking to me. Dr. Fauci directly says it needs to be seriously looked at. >“Anecdotally, there’s no question that there are a considerable number of individuals who have a postviral syndrome that really, in many respects, can incapacitate them for weeks and weeks following so-called recovery and clearing of the virus,” Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said in July during a COVID-19 webinar organized by the International AIDS Society. Also in the webinar: >"This is something we really need to seriously look at because it very well might be a post-viral syndrome associated with COVID-19". That sounds like he finds them credible. No one's arguing doctors are sometimes wrong. The issue is whether it's warranted to dismiss the opinions of independent experts around the world who have now seen multiple new coronavirus outbreaks, even if we don't have scientific studies on the current coronavirus outbreak.