3 ms·
Note that the parent comment isn’t saying it couldn’t be a real phenomenon, just that you need proper studies to distinguish it from people’s general tendency t
by ghufran_syed 6y ago
Note that the parent comment isn’t saying it couldn’t be a real phenomenon, just that you need proper studies to distinguish it from people’s general tendency to wrongly attribute causation. Assuming there exists a group of post-covid patients who have prolonged symptoms, it’s in their best interests that there be a proper study, with a robust case definition. Otherwise, we’re unlikely to find any therapeutic interventions that will help these people, because any actual therapeutic benefit may be drowned out by potentially large numbers of other people who have similar symptoms but not the same etiology.
FWIW, I’m an ER doc and see lot’s of covid and post-covid patients, as well as working with lots of staff who have had it - for most people, the after-effects last longer than a bad flu, but not as long as, say, after getting a bacterial pneumonia. But it’s certainly plausible that covid could cause prolonged symptoms (3-6 months) in some patients.
So the way to “take these patients seriously” is not to assume their prolonged symptoms must be due to covid, but to consider that they might be due to covid...and then use that to motivate a study that actually investigates the phenomenon.
- charwalker 6y agoI think this is the correct take on the top level comment. It is more dismissive than needed but is trying to get the point across that the data cannot speak for itself and is amplified by the voices of the patients seeking answers. Modern medicine may have clues but no single answer or test to confirm. We won't have anything definitive and applicable to the general population without proper research and an adequate sample size.