6 ms·
Why ex?
by beagle3 6y ago
Why ex?
- capableweb 6y agoQuick look at the profile (unless you recognize the name) reveals Gregory is the founder of ReadMe.com (when you guys moved from io?!), so supposedly ex to start his own company!
- gkoberger 6y agoLast summer! It's the most expensive thing I own haha
- bigyikes 6y agoWow, did that help business, or was it more of a vanity thing? I was thinking domains didn’t matter all that much.
- gkoberger 6y agoI think pg sums it up the best: http://www.paulgraham.com/name.html http://www.paulgraham.com/name.html "The problem with not having the .com of your name is that it signals weakness. Unless you're so big that your reputation precedes you, a marginal domain suggests you're a marginal company." I'd say there's a few major reasons: protecting the name and signaling we're a real company to larger corporations. For us, we also host websites that allows JS/CSS/HTML, so being able to put our assets on a separate domain helps with security issues.
- billiam 6y agoWhew, that is the sentiment of a true plutocrat and elitist. You're weak unless you're rich and pay to rent in the good part of town. Sure, it's desirable to look serious to commercial partners and investors, but mostly it's an Internet branding tax. Most of your customers will Google your site.
- bawolff 6y agoI definitely look down at people with .info domains. The effect is alive. (TLDs are stupid at this point. If it was up to me we would kill all of them except .com and .org)
- Reelin 6y ago> kill all of them except .com and .org A bit tangential, but ignoring reality for a minute wouldn't it make more sense to kill .com and .org as well and retain only the country codes (ie .us, .uk, .cn, etc)? At least it would make the various jurisdictional issues clear. (In a perfect world, I also wish there were legislation forcing any and all local government entities to use appropriate <service>.gov.<country> domains. It is incredibly difficult to explain to the average person why a few government websites have .com or .org or other random TLDs, and the inconsistency of it all makes things easier for scammers.)
- bawolff 6y agoHmm that's an interesting idea. I personally like the idea of "cyberspace" transcending national boundries (i know, eyeroll), which is why i'm a fan of only .com, but your proposal makes a certain amount of sense.
- 3131s 6y agoWhat? How does limiting TLDs to only .com make any sense and how does that help with transcending national boundaries? I'm no fan of how new TLDs have been rolled out either... Take a look at the Public Suffix List because you'll need to do away with a lot of TLDs.
- gkoberger 6y agoYikes. It's just a business doing business things. You can put away the guillotine; it's just a domain name.
- ulimn 6y ago> Most of your customers will Google your site. And that's why seeing ".com" is important. You just proved his point, duh.
- gkoberger 6y agoI left 8 years ago! I loved it there, but left to start ReadMe.com. But I still love the people there (and created https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24135032 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24135032 recently)