Agreed. There's more than a few topics where I self censor. It isn't about the points. Most of these things are either beating a dead horse or the quality of th

Agreed. There's more than a few topics where I self censor. It isn't about the points. Most of these things are either beating a dead horse or the quality of the responses aren't worth engaging with. Some are just too contentious. Other times, I just can't resist. It is disconcerting to see the popular or establishment view presented with different standards of evidence, sources or logic. I'd leave "I disagree" as an option in this hypothetical. The down-voting user would have it as a shadow vote, without impacting the comment. For scientifically inaccurate, I think they should be prompted to reply with a refutation. Needs elaboration should just open a reply with "Could you please elaborate on..."