3 ms·

Another white man here that disagrees with your assessment. How can pointing out the lack of representation on the nation's highest court with a desire to fix (

Another white man here that disagrees with your assessment. How can pointing out the lack of representation on the nation's highest court with a desire to fix (the Biden quote) ever be construed as "overt and open sexism"?

thu2111 6y ago
These posts are absurd, it's like we aren't speaking the same language. How did you get like this? Sexism means discrimination on the basis of sex. Stating the next SC justice isn't allowed to be a man is sexism. That is undeniably a correct statement. Now, you believe sexism against men is justified. You should own that and just admit you're deeply sexist, you're engaging in misandry and female supremacy and you're happy about that. Don't try and alter the English language to pretend that isn't your position: own it. But I don't know if you will be able to, as you're not only distorting the language around the word sexism. Biden isn't "pointing out" a lack of representation. He isn't a passive observer merely remarking on a phenomenon. He's stated very clearly that he should be the guy to pick and he will not pick a man or a white person under any circumstances. That's not "pointing out" - it's active sexual discrimination against men and whites. Again, own it if you like. Say you're a sexist and you think it's justified, you wish it weren't illegal because men should lose by default. But don't try and claim that statements like "men are better than women" isn't sexism.
- Falling3 6y ago
  There is such an astounding amount of bad faith commentary in your reply that I'm just honestly shocked you can put so many ridiculous words in the mouth of a stranger based on a single sentence while simultaneously taking both the intellectual and moral high road. I'd try and discuss this further, but you clearly have zero interest in an actual discussion or in examining your views.

thu2111 6y ago

These posts are absurd, it's like we aren't speaking the same language. How did you get like this? Sexism means discrimination on the basis of sex. Stating the next SC justice isn't allowed to be a man is sexism. That is undeniably a correct statement. Now, you believe sexism against men is justified. You should own that and just admit you're deeply sexist, you're engaging in misandry and female supremacy and you're happy about that. Don't try and alter the English language to pretend that isn't your position: own it. But I don't know if you will be able to, as you're not only distorting the language around the word sexism. Biden isn't "pointing out" a lack of representation. He isn't a passive observer merely remarking on a phenomenon. He's stated very clearly that he should be the guy to pick and he will not pick a man or a white person under any circumstances. That's not "pointing out" - it's active sexual discrimination against men and whites. Again, own it if you like. Say you're a sexist and you think it's justified, you wish it weren't illegal because men should lose by default. But don't try and claim that statements like "men are better than women" isn't sexism.

Falling3 6y ago
There is such an astounding amount of bad faith commentary in your reply that I'm just honestly shocked you can put so many ridiculous words in the mouth of a stranger based on a single sentence while simultaneously taking both the intellectual and moral high road. I'd try and discuss this further, but you clearly have zero interest in an actual discussion or in examining your views.