> While outrage culture exists I don't think it is possible to have high-trust institutions that are run by human. Period. I would say that before forming such

> While outrage culture exists I don't think it is possible to have high-trust institutions that are run by human. Period. I would say that before forming such conclusions, we should actually try to do it first. > And I don't know if it's possible to get rid of outrage culture, any suggestions are welcome. I suggest treating it like an engineering problem, something humans are quite good at. Analyze it as a behavior exhibited by systems, in this case, roughly: - People (the human mind) - Society (a set of networked human minds, networked via a variety of flawed communication mediums, some of which have human minds filtering and transforming what passes through them). This is an extremely high level perspective, there is obviously a ton of important complexity (of varying importance) here and there within the system, but a high level perspective like this seems like where an engineer would start when analyzing a misbehaving system.