>This test is so poorly done it feels like it must have been done for propaganda or bad PR. I disagree. The test is not poorly done. Such conditions are trivia

>This test is so poorly done it feels like it must have been done for propaganda or bad PR. I disagree. The test is not poorly done. Such conditions are trivial for a human to recognize. You will not be allowed behind a wheel if you could not avoid a dummy while driving. If an AI can't recognize such trivial circumstances why would I let it take control when I'm going 60 mph on a freeway? That's like putting my kid on my lap and letting him drive... yeah of course I can take over control at anytime, but it's still illegal to do this and absolutely insane. Let's put it this way, if it's insane and illegal to put a 7 year old kid on your lap and allow him to drive at 60 mph down a freeway (even when you have executive override abilities to take control at anytime) then why is it normal to have an AI (who would do considerably worse than a 7 year old at recognizing a pedestrian) do what's basically the same thing? Is this Bad PR or is it a Tesla owner trying to justify his purchase?