2 ms·
I kind of agree, but calling it technology is pretty broad (article it's mostly app related). Technology-wise, I also expect things ranging from a flashlight to
by scoutt 6y ago
I kind of agree, but calling it technology is pretty broad (article it's mostly app related). Technology-wise, I also expect things ranging from a flashlight to a CT scan to not suck, and they usually do not.
Edit: flashlight instead of torchlight.
- typon 6y agoPeople literally have to get months of training to operate these machines because they are highly specialized, non intuitive and finnicky. Using medical instruments as an example of good software isn't a great idea
- scoutt 6y agoI don't get the point of your comment. Sorry. What about the flashlight? Since the article talks about technology... Why is "technology = only software or apps or things related to a phone"? Technology can be something that goes from fire, passing through a pencil up to whatever application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes. Edit: flashlight instead of torchlight.
- StavrosK 6y agoJeez man, what kind of torchlight did you buy?!
- kroltan 6y agoConsumer technology would be a better qualification. Or at least computers. - The whole current USB ports fiasco; - Just look at any wireless headset and you'll find at least 2 major bugs, between connectivity, quality, or general usability; - Smart TVs suck terribly even at the high-ish level, both performance, image quality and usability; - Touchscreen stovetops get triggered by food splatter; And so on Basically anything that has a microprocessor anywhere is bound to go haywire somehow at some point.
- scoutt 6y agoYes, consumer technology is more appropriate. Better yet consumer software/electronics, I believe.