3 ms·
Visual c++ 6 circa 1998 was the pinnacle of responsive IDEs, and was more responsive in 2000 on 2000 hardware than the the visual studio 2013 o last used in 201
by beagle3 6y ago
Visual c++ 6 circa 1998 was the pinnacle of responsive IDEs, and was more responsive in 2000 on 2000 hardware than the the visual studio 2013 o last used in 2015 - are new versions any better, or so you still wait a couple of seconds when pressing “run” just for the IDE to figure out that no compiling needs to be done?
- mrkeen 6y agoYes, so much this. My thoughts on Eclipse the entire time I used it was "why can't this be as fast and reliable as VB6?"
- beagle3 6y agoIt is ridiculous. In 2015, when I had to port something to Windows, I was so frustrated by the IDE speed that I was doing “make ; make test” outside instead - only using the ide when I needed the debugger. (I had makefiles from Linux, I would probably have been to lazy to create them if I didn’t)
- fomine3 6y agoI refuse to use the VB6 IDE that truncates characters from variable viewer.