3 ms·
It might be a symptom of the poor state of media nowadays. I'm not that old at all, but I remember seeing much more streams of constant information on ongoing
by kace91 6y ago
It might be a symptom of the poor state of media nowadays.
I'm not that old at all, but I remember seeing much more streams of constant information on ongoing events back when I was a kid (my father was a journalist so there was a lot of press bought daily at home).
The system is so dependent on cycles and hyperbole that they simply can afford to keep reporting on an ongoing event for a month, even if it's small tidbits, because they fear the audience will be "satiated". Instead, it's going to be an extreme news explosion at the end of the whole thing, when everything is said and done, so they can probably milk/manufacture outrage - but that information will be completely useless to the public by then.