4 ms·

Yes, completely out of context and without any implied qualifications, such a ban would be too much. But that's not what we're dealing with here, is it? This is

Yes, completely out of context and without any implied qualifications, such a ban would be too much. But that's not what we're dealing with here, is it? This is not something that will remain in effect for years to come and I think any reasonable person understands that. Yes, I do consider a period of a few weeks or maybe even a couple months of self quarantine a small sacrifice compared with the alternative as I understand it. I was happy to comply with the shutdowns when they were in effect in Colorado earlier this year and I think these young people should also be willing to do it. And I don't waste time kidding myself into thinking I can effectively judge these actions with no expertise in these areas. I'm not an epidemiologist and I'm sure neither are you.

aww_dang 6y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22new+normal%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=%22new+normal%22 >"But this doesn’t mean we should go back to the ‘old normal’." https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid-19/information/covid-19-new-normal https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid-19/info... >"There's nothing new about the 'new normal'. Here's why" >"Normal' has not worked for a majority of the world's population, so why would it start working now? We should use our discomfort to forge a new paradigm instead." https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/theres-nothing-new-about-this-new-normal-heres-why/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/theres-nothing-new-ab...