I thought we were referring to packing the federal courts. As judicial review is a power solely reserved for the Supreme Court, I don't think it applies to this

I thought we were referring to packing the federal courts. As judicial review is a power solely reserved for the Supreme Court, I don't think it applies to this discussion. The phrase in question has a Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_and_objective_standard_of_reasonableness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_and_objective_stand... And a BAR exam study page: https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/subjective-standard-of-reasonableness https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/subjective-standard-of-reas... You don't get to just change the meaning of such phrases on a whim. Supreme Court or not. You'd be re-interpeting hundreds of years of case law for the sake of extending a single decision, which is easier and more subtle to do in a myriad of ways. It's like worrying a programmer is going to redefine the meaning of the word compiler or something.