A better argument about user freedom would be: * The social media companies that had to deal with having their apps blocked because of Apple's puritanical stan

A better argument about user freedom would be: * The social media companies that had to deal with having their apps blocked because of Apple's puritanical stance on nudity. * The recent rule change banning vaping and tobacco related apps. * The inability for FOSS projects to easily distribute to users without paying a $100/year fee for something they want to give away. Users can only acquire it through the app store, or compile themselves and go through an inconvenient signing process to load it on. And I believe that's very temporary. It's pretty offensive that a company thinks they can dictate what sort of software you run on your own device.