3 ms·
Well there is already Sneakers-As-A-Service so it just feels natural that every company will try to screw consumers into that tactic since a lot of people joins
by cooldevguy 6y ago
Well there is already Sneakers-As-A-Service so it just feels natural that every company will try to screw consumers into that tactic since a lot of people joins it for "perveiced" convenience
https://www.on-running.com/en-us/cyclon https://www.on-running.com/en-us/cyclon
- li4ick 6y agoAdd that to your aaS bullshit filter.
- yazaddaruvala 6y agoAlso, What is the real difference between Sneakers-As-A-Service and planned obsolescence? If my Nike shoes only last 3 years (or go out of fashion) and I need to repay $120 to get another pair, is it any different than paying $3 per month?
- purple-again 6y agoWow, tearing down all of the bullshit in that site deserves its own submission but for now I will just focus on one thing: $30.00 per month for running shoes. What? You can get two pairs of shoes for that at Payless shoes. They will last at least 6 months. Is anyone out there paying $360/year for running shoes? If anyone is interested in this product I would LOVE to hear about your reasoning.