3 ms·
your idea of "acting ethically" may not be how I interpret the situation. Therein lies the creation of division. The "worst thing that happens is ICE uses anot
by hiimtroymclure 6y ago
your idea of "acting ethically" may not be how I interpret the situation. Therein lies the creation of division.
The "worst thing that happens is ICE uses another vendor" is such a slippery slope view point.
Should all 3rd party tech companies stop servicing ICE because the employees refuse to support it? What about the millions of Americans who do not work for a company with that power? Should you be given the ability to undermine something that impacts everyone?
This is the direction we are heading and it will create division.
- _jal 6y agoPut ICE aside. Is there any organization that you feel "should" not be served by vendors? If you want to dodge by claiming it should hinge on the legality of the org, I'd be happy to give you a menu of several that were perfectly legal at the time to choose from.
- vikramkr 6y agoIf employees refuse to support it and they have the market power to change the company's behavior, then yes, they should be allowed to stop servicing ICE. Its not a power that the companies are "given" - it's a power they create by creating the product that ICE wants.