3 ms·
> What we have preserved, however, is the main restriction preventing other companies from offering TimescaleDB-as-a-Service in the cloud. I wonder how this ti
by skrebbel 6y ago
> What we have preserved, however, is the main restriction preventing other companies from offering TimescaleDB-as-a-Service in the cloud.
I wonder how this ties in to eg Digital Ocean's managed Postgres product. According to their docs[0] I can just `CREATE EXTENSION timescaledb` on a managed postgres instance and I'm done. Isn't that totally breaking the TSL? And if not, what's preventing AWS and friends from doing the same?
[0] https://www.digitalocean.com/docs/databases/postgresql/resources/supported-extensions/ https://www.digitalocean.com/docs/databases/postgresql/resou...
EDIT: just saw that mfreed answered a similar question here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24581533 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24581533
- akulkarni 6y agoThe version available in Digital Ocean's managed Postgres product is the Apache-2 edition of TimescaleDB. It doesn't included advanced capabilities like native compression, multi-node, continuous aggregations, etc.