42 ms·
Great, if I don't have an approved impairment that meets your standards I'd better type 200 WPM. (I type around 110 WPM, but I have no frame of reference for w
by juped 6y ago
Great, if I don't have an approved impairment that meets your standards I'd better type 200 WPM.
(I type around 110 WPM, but I have no frame of reference for whether this is "good". Who cares?)
- illuminated 6y agoNot sure if you've seen my edit in the original comment: "fast typing" was a wrong choice of words. I meant "touch typing".