2 ms·
I just don't find your cognitive dissonance to be relevant. You’re asking for something to be proved - or supporting evidence that requires a whole dissertatio
by vmception 6y ago
I just don't find your cognitive dissonance to be relevant.
You’re asking for something to be proved - or supporting evidence that requires a whole dissertation - because your exposure is starting from a position that is fundamentally wrong.
“Suspicious” is a misnomer referring to an automatic reporting threshold, that in fewer additional circumstances allows for discretion in filing. The end.
- lixtra 6y ago> from a position that is fundamentally wrong I’m baffled how asking for data is revealing my position? I had the hope that your position is well founded and it would be easy to point to actual data. I hardly believe that the compliance laws are not accompanied by studies that collect the data that i asked for. So it should be out there.
- vmception 6y agoLike I said, I dont find your cognitive dissonance relevant enough to want to do that research for you. If you do research it, I hope the filter bubble Google put you in lets you get access to this version of reality. Good luck.