4 ms·
Yes, because your validation set performance is imperfectly correlated with performance on more samples (because it's of finite size), so it will tend to overes
by gwern 6y ago
Yes, because your validation set performance is imperfectly correlated with performance on more samples (because it's of finite size), so it will tend to overestimate within-distribution. There's also the problem that you probably want to deploy it on data which was not exactly collected the same way. So you have issues of both internal and external validity.
In practice, at least for CNN classifiers on ImageNet etc, it seems to be a pretty minor issue overall. Some links: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11561 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11561 https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00451 https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00451 https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10811 https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10811 http://gradientscience.org/data_rep_bias/ http://gradientscience.org/data_rep_bias/ http://gradientscience.org/data_rep_bias.pdf http://gradientscience.org/data_rep_bias.pdf https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10498 https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10498 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02559 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02559 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07159 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07159 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08974 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08974 https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10178 https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10178 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11370#google https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11370#google