3 ms·
> there's less money at the state level vs the federal level So if anything, it means to me that we need to work on increasing roles of individual states and
by AlexTWithBeard 6y ago
> there's less money at the state level vs the federal level
So if anything, it means to me that we need to work on increasing roles of individual states and decreasing federal powers.
- rtkwe 6y agoThat's more of a question of where you come down on the idea of federalism. Personally I think way more stuff makes sense to have created and funded uniformly across the country than fragmented. The biggest budget sinks at the federal level of military and entitlement programs like social security make sense to be there. The military for obvious reasons makes more sense to have funded from there and then social security et al as well because people often move from where they were working to where they retire so trying to fund that at the state level get's a bit dicey for moving the money to where the old people actually are.