4 ms·
Although I understand the worry, I am getting more and more annoying with people painting all populist leaders as anti-democratic, even when they are trying to
by speeder 6y ago
Although I understand the worry, I am getting more and more annoying with people painting all populist leaders as anti-democratic, even when they are trying to make institutions more democratic.
I am from Brazil, and media (both local and international) loves to portray him as some sort of conservative dictator.
Except he been trying to do the opposite for a while now, for example people called him "genocidal" because he opposed cities issuing lockdown orders.
Thing is, in our constitution only the president can issue lockdown, and only after being reviewed by three different oversight groups, because we had a nasty dicatorship during cold war, our new constituion was written deliberately to make really hard to create a new dictatorship, yet our supreme court is happily ignoring a lot of parts of our constitution to give the government dicatorship powers, and the president is opposing it, but every time he does so, people say he, is the dictator.
Another case: population voted against arms control in a country-wide vote around 2003, government back then issued arms control anyway (they made it legal to have weapons if you had a license, and then stopped giving licenses, thus effectively banning weapons against the wishes of the population), Bolsonaro more than once talked about it, and tried to undo the ban and follow what was voted for, again people kept saying that this was him being a dictator.
Our supreme court been under heavy criticism lately for various reasons, and they reacted badly (for example one judge called police on a guy that criticized him in person on an airplane and got him arrested), the media is portraying this as the president trying to get rid of the supreme court and have more power for himself, and the supreme court as democratic heroes, but that is obviously not what is going on, the supreme court for example breached a fundamental principle of democracy recently when they started a case themselves, becoming court+pŕosecutors at same time, something that is NOT supposed to ever happen, they also are trying to institute a "Fake News" law, something that obviously goes against our constitution that guarantees free speech.
- notional 6y ago“But we can’t let this place become known as a gay tourism paradise. Brazil can’t be a country of the gay world, of gay tourism. We have families,” Bolsonaro added Bolsonaro, a former army captain, has long been notorious for his homophobic comments, once declaring: “Yes, I’m homophobic – and very proud of it.” Bolsonaro claimed “homosexual fundamentalists” were brainwashing heterosexual children to “become gays and lesbians to satisfy them sexually in the future”. He doesn't sound very democratic to me. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/26/bolsonaro-accused-of-inciting-hatred-with-gay-paradise-comment https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/26/bolsonaro-accu...
- eli_gottlieb 6y agoA nine-day old greenhorn account is here telling us that LGBTQ+ rights are not only a social good, but the pillar of democracy, and if someone disagrees, they are fundamentally antidemocratic? I'm sorry, but I think you're confusing liberalism with democracy. In a liberal democracy, we usually balance the two, by placing some realm of basic human and constitutional rights outside the realm of democratic political contestation. To say that submitting certain questions to the voters is undemocratic is a contradiction in terms.