3 ms·

So literally the only 2 publications remaining with a semblance of journalistic integrity that have proven to be beyond political bias? Sure, that makes complet

• NikolaNovak 6y ago
  Hmm that's curious. I'm a paid subscriber to Guardian online and occasionally subscribe to its weekly paper summary; I would agree with its journalistic integrity; while I agree with their perspective though, it actually gets too much even for me these days, and I would not call them "beyond political bias" by ANY stretch of imagination. If nothing else, they explicitly endorse candidates.
  • mhh__ 6y ago
    The notion of bias is totally meaningless. What you should worry about is truthfulness. Everyone is biased, some people lie even if that means being selective in the sources they use to build their narrative rather than outright fabrication. I have read the guardian for my entire life, I am aware of it's biases but I would not continue to trust the newspaper if I believed it was lying. It seems to be an American disease spreading throughout the world to accuse things of bias constantly, when the root issue is just falsehoods and being economical with the truth. A newspaper should aim to represent multiple views but should not shy from having the conviction to both be explicit about what the truth is and who they support.