4 ms·

False, obviously. The resolutions were about promoting family values, things like making towns family friendly environment by building kindergartens, etc. There

by mamon 6y ago

False, obviously. The resolutions were about promoting family values, things like making towns family friendly environment by building kindergartens, etc. There's not a single word on LGBT, homosexuality, etc in any of those resolutions. You can read the whole thing here: https://v.fastcdn.co/u/ff8eca37/50262470-0-SKPR-commune-ENG.pdf https://v.fastcdn.co/u/ff8eca37/50262470-0-SKPR-commune-ENG....

mcphage 6y ago
> There's not a single word on LGBT, homosexuality, etc in any of those resolutions. You can read the whole thing here. If you download that link, and read it, this is the very first section: > [...] including the protection of marriage, being a union of a man and a woman, as well as the family, motherhood and parenthood, the right to protect family life [...]
pjc50 6y ago
Yeah, the other commenter has it right - you don't have to mention queerness to build a system of prejudice, and the "marriage is between a man and a woman" is just the top headline aspect of this. Further down in the document: "Programmes of partnerships with communi-ty organisations should respect the principle of strengthening the family and marriage and rule out the funding of any projects harmful to these values. It is especially crucial to exclude any chance of allocating public funds and public property for projects that undermine the con-stitutional identity of marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman" == explicit prohibition on use of public funds for any pro-non-straight marriage activism "Parents should be allowed to verify any external organisations operating on the premises of the school and any materials they use during non--compulsory classes dually: both individually and collectively – through the parents’ board. It is a good practice to present information inc-luding not only the name but also the program-me and profile of the organisation to each parent separately, in a way allowing them to become familiar with the content thereof before enrolment. A similar mechanism should be applied to any other teaching and educational activities pursu-ed by schools or institutions that go beyond the curriculum or that involve issues covered by the cu-rriculum of Family Life Education, including those financed from public grants" == any parent can veto any external material on ideological grounds

by mamon 6y ago

mcphage 6y ago

> There's not a single word on LGBT, homosexuality, etc in any of those resolutions. You can read the whole thing here. If you download that link, and read it, this is the very first section: > [...] including the protection of marriage, being a union of a man and a woman, as well as the family, motherhood and parenthood, the right to protect family life [...]

pjc50 6y ago

Yeah, the other commenter has it right - you don't have to mention queerness to build a system of prejudice, and the "marriage is between a man and a woman" is just the top headline aspect of this. Further down in the document: "Programmes of partnerships with communi-ty organisations should respect the principle of strengthening the family and marriage and rule out the funding of any projects harmful to these values. It is especially crucial to exclude any chance of allocating public funds and public property for projects that undermine the con-stitutional identity of marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman" == explicit prohibition on use of public funds for any pro-non-straight marriage activism "Parents should be allowed to verify any external organisations operating on the premises of the school and any materials they use during non--compulsory classes dually: both individually and collectively – through the parents’ board. It is a good practice to present information inc-luding not only the name but also the program-me and profile of the organisation to each parent separately, in a way allowing them to become familiar with the content thereof before enrolment. A similar mechanism should be applied to any other teaching and educational activities pursu-ed by schools or institutions that go beyond the curriculum or that involve issues covered by the cu-rriculum of Family Life Education, including those financed from public grants" == any parent can veto any external material on ideological grounds