3 ms·
To reword: basically, you're right in that if you own the code, you can license it under GPL with an exception to allow linking to anything you want. If you don
by versteegen 6y ago
To reword: basically, you're right in that if you own the code, you can license it under GPL with an exception to allow linking to anything you want. If you don't add necessary exceptions and distribute binaries, you've provided an invalid license to code you don't own, and those binaries aren't lawfully redistributable.
See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLib...
(Would have edited my post to this, but the noprocast timeout got me)
- alanfranz 6y agoI think we agree and we understand the license. I was trying to clarify the point that the GPL is binding for the licensee, not the copyright holder, since that seemed tonbe CursedUrn's doubt. You are right that plain vanilla GPL (rightfully) places restrictions about what you can link to from your program.