I got the impression the commenter was just maybe letting their frustration get the better of them in their expression; I also found the article a bit head-scra

I got the impression the commenter was just maybe letting their frustration get the better of them in their expression; I also found the article a bit head-scratching and definitely understand the wider frustration with Wikipedia editorialising having a particular bias at times. I'm not saying that's the case here (I thought it was an interesting article), just offering context for why it might have been frustration rather than deliberate bad faith.