3 ms·
Just about to put a substantial project into production using Quarkus. I would say the main advantages vs SB are: * mostly uses standard javax/Jakarta/Eclipse
by acg62 6y ago
Just about to put a substantial project into production using Quarkus. I would say the main advantages vs SB are:
* mostly uses standard javax/Jakarta/Eclipse etc APIs so code is relatively portable (in ~600 classes I found 8 quarkus imports)
* build time DI/weaving
* best dev-mode autoreloading I have seen
* in general, less Spring-y
* less reliance on classpath-searching and reflection voodoo, less weird shit breaking bc of dependency version conflicts
* stack traces and class names (https://gist.github.com/thom-nic/2c74ed4075569da0f80b https://gist.github.com/thom-nic/2c74ed4075569da0f80b) that fit within a human’s field of vision
* less overriding feeling of death by OOP
We started with Spring Boot, switched about halfway through and never looked back.
- pjmlp 6y ago> mostly uses standard javax/Jakarta/Eclipse etc APIs This is the selling point for me, never was a Spring fan.