2 ms·
For starters, all the old designs are built with analog automation which is no longer available, so at the very minimum, you need redesign the automation system
by Maakuth 6y ago
For starters, all the old designs are built with analog automation which is no longer available, so at the very minimum, you need redesign the automation system. Keep in mind, every component you install will need to be certified and tracked from raw materials up to follow stated processes, which need to be nuclear safety certified too. And you need to have two separate families of parts so the requirement of diversity in implementation is fulfilled, to avoid coinciding typical failures. At least now that EPR projects are close to completion, there's now a precedent that it is even possible to implement digital automation in accordance to western nuclear safety standards.
Also the mechanical safety standards are way stricter now, so you can't really just take an old design and add digital bus automation. You need more redundant safety systems, corium catcher and stuff. Not so easy.
- cbmuser 6y agoTwo EPRs have been running in China since 2018 in Taishan. It’s not a design problem, it’s a bureaucratic problem.
- Maakuth 6y agoThose are not under western safety regime.
- epistasis 6y agoChina thought they could build them in 48 months, and it ended up taking more than twice as long. Is China planning any more EPRs? I can't find any evidence of them. I would agree that it's a bureaucratic problem, but it's a bureaucratic problem of the construction industries in all Western nations. And nobody can even figure out what exactly the problem is, or how to change it.