4 ms·
Isn't this the point of the legislation? If you want to be deemed a public square type of space that is fine but you don't then get to impose arbitrary rules a
by waheoo 6y ago
Isn't this the point of the legislation?
If you want to be deemed a public square type of space that is fine but you don't then get to impose arbitrary rules about what is said, that would mean it is not a public place and is in fact a private space being editorialized by your private rulings on what speech should be allowed.
This is a very good move and clarifies everything for everyone.
- curryst 6y agoThat has nothing to do with Section 230 protection. Nor am I aware of any large Internet site that has ever pretended to be a public square (beyond Reddit, who announced the change). I don't see why this is a good move, other than opening up a bunch of sites to liability. And it's going to make the ToS even longer so that they can make it "particular". Who wins here exactly?