3 ms·

Scores are as follows, all latest stable releases: (edit: incorporating other responses) OSX stable builds: Chrome: 288 +13 Opera: 258 +7

Scores are as follows, all latest stable releases: (edit: incorporating other responses) OSX stable builds: Chrome: 288 +13 Opera: 258 +7 FireFox: 255 +9 Safari: 228 +7 OSX dev builds: Windows 7 stable builds: Opera: 258 +7 FifeFox: 240 +9 IE9: 130 +5 Windows 7 dev builds: IE10 PP: 130 +5 Linux stable builds: Chrome: 273 +13 FF 3.6: 155 +4 Linux dev builds: I'm surprised that firefox scored as (relatively) poorly as it did, although I suspect lack of support for closed formats had something to do with that. Similarly, I'm a bit surprised at Safari's poor showing given Apple's insistence that "HTML5 is the Future". I'd be interested to see similar tests on Windows/Linux, with ie9 in there. Also, it'd be interesting to see how the beta/dev builds rate.

Athtar 16y ago
Don't have Opera and Safari installed on this machine but these are the results on Windows 7 32-bit: FF 4.0.1: 240 + 9 bonus points IE9: 130 + 5 bonus points IE10 PP: 130 + 5 bonus points
- skymt 16y ago
  Opera 11.10 on Windows 7 scores 258 + 7 bonus points
- redthrowaway 16y ago
  Interesting that FF scored worse on Windows than OSX. I can't say I'm surprised by IE's performance, however.
  - sid0 16y ago
    The 15 point gap is because Athtar doesn't have up-to-date graphics drivers for WebGL. It's otherwise the same.
Tiomaidh 16y ago
Chrome 10.0.648.127 on Linux: 273 + 13. Firefox 3.6.11 on Linux: 155 + 4. (Ouch...) (By "Linux", I mean 64-bit Crunchbang 9.04.)
- melling 16y ago
  The current production version of Firefox 4 was released about a month ago and it's approaching 90 million downloads. http://glow.mozilla.com http://glow.mozilla.com You are using old Firefox numbers. A lot has happened in the year since Firefox 3.6 was released.
  - kylemathews 16y ago
    Agreed. I get 240 + 9 bonus points on Firefox 4.0 on Ubuntu.
  - Tiomaidh 16y ago
    I know. I just included it because I happened to have it installed (it actually came by default). My main browser is Chrome.
- kylemathews 16y ago
  Chrome 12.0.725.0 Ubuntu 10.10: 293 + 13
tvon 16y ago
FWIW, WebKit nightly (OSX): 271 +9 edit: Can anyone familiar with Chrome development shed some light on how it is "ahead" of the WebKit nightly? Regressions? Is there rendering code in Chrome that doesn't get pushed back to WebKit?

Athtar 16y ago

Don't have Opera and Safari installed on this machine but these are the results on Windows 7 32-bit: FF 4.0.1: 240 + 9 bonus points IE9: 130 + 5 bonus points IE10 PP: 130 + 5 bonus points

skymt 16y ago
Opera 11.10 on Windows 7 scores 258 + 7 bonus points
redthrowaway 16y ago
Interesting that FF scored worse on Windows than OSX. I can't say I'm surprised by IE's performance, however.
- sid0 16y ago
  The 15 point gap is because Athtar doesn't have up-to-date graphics drivers for WebGL. It's otherwise the same.

Tiomaidh 16y ago

Chrome 10.0.648.127 on Linux: 273 + 13. Firefox 3.6.11 on Linux: 155 + 4. (Ouch...) (By "Linux", I mean 64-bit Crunchbang 9.04.)

melling 16y ago
The current production version of Firefox 4 was released about a month ago and it's approaching 90 million downloads. http://glow.mozilla.com http://glow.mozilla.com You are using old Firefox numbers. A lot has happened in the year since Firefox 3.6 was released.
- kylemathews 16y ago
  Agreed. I get 240 + 9 bonus points on Firefox 4.0 on Ubuntu.
- Tiomaidh 16y ago
  I know. I just included it because I happened to have it installed (it actually came by default). My main browser is Chrome.
kylemathews 16y ago
Chrome 12.0.725.0 Ubuntu 10.10: 293 + 13

tvon 16y ago

FWIW, WebKit nightly (OSX): 271 +9 edit: Can anyone familiar with Chrome development shed some light on how it is "ahead" of the WebKit nightly? Regressions? Is there rendering code in Chrome that doesn't get pushed back to WebKit?