4 ms·

Because that would be sprints not spent making more money for Alphabet shareholders

• moltar 6y ago
  But that’s not true though. Creators create content and make money with ads. No creators = no ad platform.
  • edoceo 6y ago
    The number of creators harmed is less than the number of other creators, new creators and other factors. Loss of 0.00001% of the content on YT is, literally, no big deal. You, me, all other creators just don't matter. That is BigG just don't give a f---.
    • eru 6y ago
      Not sure your logic holds. If Google is so big that 0.00001% loss of revenue doesn't register for them, they are surely big enough to spare 0.00001% of total engineering time to fix that loss? In fact, I hear that as a common complaint that when working as an engineer at Google most of the time you are just making some system fractions of a percent more efficient. Just to be sure, I am not saying that either your premise or the statement you are inferring is wrong. No opinion on that. I'm just saying that your premises don't lead to the conclusion. (But your conclusion might be right for other reasons.)
      • edoceo 6y ago
        I'm saying that a loss of content does NOT create a loss of revenue.
        • eru 6y ago
          OK, then it makes sense.