3 ms·
With all due respect, my OP contained a relevant anecdote (Largest methane gas leak in US history, also in southern California). I didn't say whether democrats
by bgorman 6y ago
With all due respect, my OP contained a relevant anecdote (Largest methane gas leak in US history, also in southern California). I didn't say whether democrats are good or bad, I just asserted that they don't care, and I offered the relevant anecdote about how the attorney general who reviewed the previous methane gas leak has continued to ascend in politics, while no criminal charges have been filed.
I think many people are probably not aware of the additional context I have brought to this situation, and I certainly think it is notable given the thread.
I would like to know why exactly you think my post is flamebait. I expressed a single opinion, not saying if it is good or bad result - and provided evidence to support my opinion.
Plenty of people make posts on Hackernews like "Facebook doesn't respect user privacy" - which is obviously controversial. I cannot help but feel like my post was singled out because some people think that the objective truths in my post are inconvenient.
- dang 6y agoInflammatory generalizations like "California Democrats simply do not care about the environment" are garden-variety political flamebait.
- bgorman 6y agoI appreciate you taking the time to provide a nuanced and thoughtful reply to my question
- dang 6y agoI take that as meaning that I came across as dismissive. Sorry! I would have been happy to add to it, but I couldn't think of anything else to say. Does it really seem otherwise to you? Any statement of the form "$group simply do not care about $good" is going to land as flamebait.