4 ms·
More than 25,000 YouTubers now publish to the LBRY protocol, with more coming over every day, for reasons just like this. The total reach of these creators is m
by kauffj 6y ago
More than 25,000 YouTubers now publish to the LBRY protocol, with more coming over every day, for reasons just like this. The total reach of these creators is more than 400,000,000 people.
We're just rolling out our mainstream video product explicitly designed to compete with YouTube @ https://odysee.com https://odysee.com
To learn more about the protocol itself, check out https://lbry.tech https://lbry.tech
- ocdtrekkie 6y agoI was kinda interested until I hit the "100 LBC to get started", and realized it was a blockchain/cryptocurrency thing.
- ColanR 6y agoI vaguely remember this kind of tech being discussed a few years ago. It seemed legit at the time, though I have no idea if this particular implementation is.
- kevin_thibedeau 6y agoIt's a necessary "evil" for small fish brokering payments to hedge against oppressive regimes that control the banking system.
- kauffj 6y agoThere is no other method to allow local control over publishing identity combined with a coherent view of a decentralized network.
- wazanator 6y agoNo offense but I'm not interested in dealing with crypto to post and watch short tutorial videos.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Psychlist 6y agoYou refuse to use https and only visit sites that still support http-only viewing?
- hashtagmarkup 6y agoYou refuse to use eyeballs for viewing?
- chihuahua 6y agoI believe that your parent post was referring to crypto-currency, not cryptography in general.
- kauffj 6y agoMany people didn't want to send email in the 1990s either. A blockchain is the only technology that allows a simultaneously decentralized and coherent view of what exists on a network along with local control over identity. I think blockchain sucks in many ways and is a big hassle. We try to hide it as much as possible. It's still the right solution to this problem.
- drummer 6y agoKeep up the good work lbry!
- blisterpeanuts 6y agoInteresting concept. I've been hoping and wishing for something, anything, to come along and replace Youtube with a freedom-of-speech oriented platform. But in the FAQ there's this: "LBRY.COM / LBRY.TV allows content to be flagged as inappropriate. Should any content be flagged as illegal, unlawful, harassing, harmful, offensive or various other reasons, LBRY.COM / LBRY.TV shall remove it from the site without delay." So how do you actually remove stuff if it's so well distributed, encrypted packets, no central authority, no censorship? Seems contradictory. Or maybe I'm just not understanding how it works and LBRY.TV only represents one implementation of a broader standard that is platformless?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- seanyesmunt 6y agoIt can be hidden from our official apps (but turned off by commenting out a single line in the UI code[0]). That content is still accessible via the LBRY sdk[1], and it is not possible for the company to remove it from the network. [0]: https://github.com/lbryio/lbry-desktop/blob/master/ui/index.jsx#L264 https://github.com/lbryio/lbry-desktop/blob/master/ui/index.... [1]: https://github.com/lbryio/lbry-sdk https://github.com/lbryio/lbry-sdk