15 ms·
> if they want to prevent evictions they need to pay the landlords what they’re owed There is cognizable legal argument that this order might qualify as a 'ta
by nkw 6y ago
> if they want to prevent evictions they need to pay the landlords what they’re owed
There is cognizable legal argument that this order might qualify as a 'taking' within the terms of the 5th amendment, which might require the government to compensate landlords, but I don't think that argument will be successful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Takings_Clause https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_...
- __blockcipher__ 6y agoHonestly, that argument seems plausible. As an aside, I wish Jacobson v Massachusetts was never a thing. It opened such a big can of worms. Public health pseudocrises now allow our government to take on full emergency powers in perpetuity.