5 ms·
I second using Wikipedia for translating, most of the time is better than using a translator or using a dictionary and sometimes is the only option for more tec
by blewboarwastake 6y ago
I second using Wikipedia for translating, most of the time is better than using a translator or using a dictionary and sometimes is the only option for more technical or specific terms.
I don't use it for comparing between languages much because I'm bilingual and my native tongue Wikipedia is not that big, but sometimes is really interesting to see the different perspectives.
- waldofrank 6y agoRegarding the comments about the importance of language links in the sidebar: if you look here you can see that the language links will be moved to a button/menu in the article header — https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Desktop_Improvements/Language_Switching_User_Tests https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Desktop_Improveme... The conclusions of the user testing show that people have a much easier time finding them in the new location.
- dirktheman 6y agoTheir test group for this feature consists of 8 to 9 people, with 5 in a control group. You'd think that for one of the most visited sites in the world, they'd have larger test groups?
- DHPersonal 6y agoTesting large amounts of people doesn’t always produce better results. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/ https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-w...
- account42 6y agoWill the new menu require JS to access?
- seszett 6y agoI just hope you can still simply hover your mouse over the languages links to see the translation without having to click and go to the foreign language article.
- ehsankia 6y agoAbsolutely, the only time I've ever used the sidebar is for language change, but with this change they are moving that to a more accessible place (Which is nice), but it also means the sidebar is now truly useless :)