2 ms·
I think you're mixing up stuff. Here is what what said: - Headline: "Los Angeles hid a methane leak for a year" - "Power revealed last month that its power pl
by capableweb 6y ago
I think you're mixing up stuff. Here is what what said:
- Headline: "Los Angeles hid a methane leak for a year"
- "Power revealed last month that its power plant had been leaking methane gas for at least three years"
- "The plant’s compressor units had been leaking gas “for the last couple years,” one staffer said. The utility had a plan in place to fix the compressors later in the year but"
- "especially because utility staff said they discovered the leak in August 2019, a full year earlier. Staffers said they didn’t notify the public because they didn’t believe anyone was at risk"
So, it has been leaking for years. But they only discovered it a year ago. They cannot hide what they do not know, hence the headline.
Although if I was the editor, I'd have chosen "Power plant leaked methane for years" rather than "Someone hid it for a year", but I guess that's the angle they've chosen (or the former was already known, so not "news").
- darth_avocado 6y agoOhh yeah, you're right, I mixed up things. Thanks.
- chabes 6y ago“Jet Propulsion Laboratory researchers first detected a methane plume at the power plant in 2017 but didn’t alert DWP until more recent drone surveys showed the leak had worsened.”