3 ms·
I remember using this a few years ago, but was irritated to see the nested div mess. It creates unnecessary amount of them to make a view look like what we inte
by anaganisk 6y ago
I remember using this a few years ago, but was irritated to see the nested div mess.
It creates unnecessary amount of them to make a view look like what we intend.
Is this common for other WYSIWYG editors for HTML? Or has this been fixed?
Good to see it still kicking around tho, given how frequently things shut down.
- tmikaeld 6y agoHaving an enormous DOM due to too much inline tags and CSS is something that site builders are plagued with. It bottles down to the fact that there's no dynamic elements to the site builders, they edit static HTML and that requires everything customized to be in-lined. It's not uncommon to see a single page have more than 2000 DOM elements, thus giving warnings in the browser console about performance issues..
- colecut 6y agoWebflow somehow does a fairly decent job of not doing this
- marc_io 6y agoYup, but it doesn't support something as simple and widespread as custom breakpoints, CSS variables, pseudo-classes, but also descendant and non-class selectors.
- batsteek 6y agoPinegrow is not a site Builder. It is an HTML editor with visual features. The structure of your documents is the one you choose. Have a look at https://pinegrow.com/docs/getting-started/is-pinegrow-the-right-choice-for-you/ https://pinegrow.com/docs/getting-started/is-pinegrow-the-ri...
- batsteek 6y agoI think you're confusing it with another tool. Pinegrow is not a page builder, it's an HTML editor with visual features and support for frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation. You can create standard HTML with the structure of your choice.
- dmje 6y agoIt doesn’t do this. It works with the html you give it, no extra fluff. I’ve been very impressed.