3 ms·
> You simply cannot make broad sweeping changes across the country to something like an election. It's controlled by every state individually. You can even see
by DFHippie 6y ago
> You simply cannot make broad sweeping changes across the country to something like an election. It's controlled by every state individually. You can even see this in mail-in balloting where some states allow it, some don't, the dates are all different, etc. This is a pain is the ass but it's by design. The US was explicitly founded to not have a strong, centralized federal government. So that makes it very difficult to make huge changes like you're talking about.
I don't think the OP is ignorant of this, or not necessarily. I think they're saying we need federal standards for national elections, which would necessitate a constitutional amendment, sure. (Among the dubious features of our constitution is its amendment mechanism.)
- pc86 6y agoThis is sort of my point. Technically it's not a national election, it's 50 state-wide elections. Each individual state's Department of State can prescribe most of the manner in which the election is handled. The electoral power starts and ends at the state level, and Constitutionally speaking, the fact that the state count is part of a national election is merely a byproduct of that.