3 ms·
My understanding is that the general argument is that if we all require security for comedy browsing, the traffic of the people who require better security is b
by peteretep 6y ago
My understanding is that the general argument is that if we all require security for comedy browsing, the traffic of the people who require better security is better because it’s less conspicuous? See also declaring your personal pronouns as someone who thinks they will never be misgendered, or using Tor for normal browsing
- throw0101a 6y agoAs I stated: I'm not against crypto in general (even for "comedy browsing") as it helps against mass surveillance. I'm just not sure as to what disabling 1.0 in the browser does. People who really care can enable 1.2+ on their servers and the browser will use it, but someone who just has a site up 'for fun' could be cut off. In some ways it motivates people to not even bother with HTTPS because it now because higher maintenance to keep up with all the settings. This could actually encourage just leaving HTTP, which could be worse.